Freedom, but for whom?

By Parth Govilkar, School of Law, University of Mumbai.

In an unparalleled move by the Information and Broadcasting Ministry on 2nd April, 2018, a directive was issued, stating that, the journalists who would be found guilty of writing or broadcasting fake news would have their accreditation withdrawn for a limited period or permanently, depending upon the frequency of the offence. If a journalist would be accused of publishing fake news, then in the first instance, accreditation would be suspended for 6 months; for 1 year in case of a second complaint and permanent cancellation if the offence is repeated. (more…)

Judiciary, Media and Public Opinion: An Overview

By Arifa Khan, Post Graduate College of Law, Osmania University, Hyderabad.

The media is regarded as the fourth pillar of any democracy. An independent media is necessary for keeping a check on the government and its organs. But with the increasing corporatisation of media and the race to grab more eyeballs for higher numbers, the media is overstepping its boundaries. It has been witnessed that the media pronounces its own verdict before the trial begins and ends up violating the principles of a fair trial. The accused persons are held guilty in the eyes of the public before a verdict is delivered in open court. Also, the sensationalism by media affects Judges and the public opinion created by the media is bound to have an effect on them. (more…)

Internet Neutrality: Can India adopt it?

By Saurav Das, School of Law, Christ University.

We must thank the telecom providers where it’s due. India has developed and on the tip of its boom due to its economy, people, education above all a good communication. Use of internet has always been a priority and this priority is greatly fulfilled by the telecom providers who operate in India and give us this service. The internet service providers have, given what the people of India needed. We are the world’s 10th largest economy1 and this statement comes true because there was a backing by the internet service providers at all times we needed it. (more…)

Net Neutrality: Effect on Innovation and Competition

By Ranjana Meharda, National Law University, Jodhpur.

Introduction:

Nowadays, one of the most important and popularly rising topic of general interest is social networking sites.  Almost everything is now available over internet and it has become a very common and general practice for a person to look for a particular solution over there and getting satisfied with the appropriate solution.  Social networking sites are made very easy to understand so as to attract as many people as possible. (more…)

Censoring the Awareness Stretch of the Press

By Anaida Kuthiala, Army Institute of Law, Mohali.

Since the very incarnation and inception and thereafter the enforcement of the Constitution of India, and in many of the Constitutions of the world, the free citizens have been given the right to freedom of speech, which, though not specifically mentioned in the Constitution of India, is itself inculcated in the very fabric of the freedom of speech and expression1 granted by the Grundnorm of our country, the Constitution of India under Article 19, Clause 1 . (more…)

Freedom of Speech v. Freedom after Speech

By Sneha Baul, CLC, Faculty of Law, Delhi University.

The Part III of the Constitution of India enumerates the Fundamental Rights. Freedom of speech and expression comes under “Right to particular freedom”. The rationale of its validity is that the fundamental rights are basic structure of the Constitution. Any law that abrogates or abridges such rights would be violative of the doctrine of basic structure.[1] Article 19(1)(a) says that all the citizens shall have the right to freedom of speech and expression. (more…)

Creation of Autonomy

By Shreyan Acharya,Vivekananda Institute of Professional Studies, Delhi.

“All Censorships exists to prevent anyone from challenging current conceptions and existing institutions. Consequently, the first condition of progress is the removal of censorship.”

  • George Bernard Shaw

The year 1997 was a landmark year, which saw far reaching measures to free the broadcast media from the shackles of Government control 50years after independence. It was the first instance of a Government, voluntarily bringing legislation to free media from its control which may set in motion a chain of events in the country ringing in revolutionary changes in the field. (more…)

Media and Censorship

By Deepti Purwar, Law College Dehradun.

Censorship is the suppression of speech, public communication or other information which may be considered objectionable, politically incorrect or inconvenient as determined by governments, media outlets, or authorities. More often than not, there is news of something getting banned somewhere in the world for reasons that seem unreasonable to many while a necessity to the rest. In India, specially, censorship exists widely. While each country and each culture censors the media in one way or the other, the amount of censorship or the cut-off level which defines what to show and what not to, differs. Sometimes the censorship can be a blanket ban on a certain taboo topics and the definition of a taboo topic would be given according to the governing authority in the country. A classic example of censorship in India is the Central Board of Film Certification or Censor Board, which comes under the purview of Ministry of Information and Broadcasting. (more…)

Censorship of Media in India

By Dewal Nath Tripathi, Vivekananda Institute of Professional Studies, New Delhi.

Censorship of media, which involves the suppression of speech or other public communication, raises issues of freedom of speech, which is nominally protected by the Indian constitution. This plays a very pivotal role in Indian media and we are bound to follow the rules set up by the government.  Nowadays it is up to the government whether they want to allow it to be aired or not which has led to a situation where we have started questioning the very essence of such a law. Though it is important to have a regulatory body which looks after boundaries of free speech but it should in no manner behave as a ban on spreading thoughts. According to the Information Technology Rules 2011, objectionable content includes anything that “threatens the unity, integrity, defence, security or sovereignty of India, friendly relations with foreign states or public order”. (more…)